It is important to understand the concept of narcissism and its effect on people and ultimately organizations. Just as a refresher, we can define narcissism as that behavior or conscious action stemming from self-interest. We must remember, however, there is a difference between self-interest for survival that includes eating, sleeping, etc. and that relating to the feeding of personal ego. Erich Fromm takes this a step further in defining something called “malignant narcissism,” which relates more to a nonsubmitted will when explaining self-interest. This is especially apparent in organizations, even seemingly successful organizations, where the leader/s or upper echelon rationalize or justify behaviors that are out of character with good moral judgment or decision-making.
All decision-making is based on this thing we call free will. The theological perspective explains evil existing in the world as a consequence of free will. God allowed human beings to have free will to make good choices or not and at that point evil entered into the world. The secular evolutionary perspective reveals that less evolved creatures depend more on instincts since they typically lack the ability to think in terms of behavioral consequences. Less evolved creatures lean more toward instincts as opposed to independent submission to a higher power, ideal, or philosophy.
Some may argue that inherent to success is a strong-willed person making tough decisions but this can be played out in everyday life in business and in church world. Tough decisions needed to be made at Enron, Arthur Andersen, and other organizations where failure due to malignant narcissism and free will decision-making was obvious. Evil dominated the decision-making. Some of this same malignant narcissism still permeates many organizations and even churches and we hear about it only when the news hits the media.
The question remains, how do we, in our decision-making and exercise of free will, submit to a higher power, ideal, or philosophy and reinforce the not so popular view that moral absolutes do, in fact, exist? From an evidentiary standpoint, we need to look at those people and organizations that have consciously chosen this thing we call submission to a higher power and see the results. This can be a double-edged sword. Once we see the positive results for our free will submission to a higher power for our decision-making and the subsequent reduction of malignant narcissism this will beg the question why our political leaders, public, and private organization CEO’s, and many of our church/not for profit leaders are not doing it.